1 comments — live from bluesky
Curious what you meant by "a compromise on messaging while maintaining integrity". What sort of compromises (which imply the science communicator should give up something of value) did you have in mind? I wouldn't view a focus on impacts as a compromise, if that's what you meant.
I meant for the person who DMed me asking why I led with it would be a rare landfall if happens. That gets the average person to open then I explain the impacts. Totally agree with you. Always want impacts emphasized, SS scale less emphasized