20 comments — live from bluesky

Knock Knock · 7 · 3h ago
Suggest substituting "welfare state" for "functioning civilization"
Sisyphus Rex · 0 · 3h ago
Was just going to comment on that. It's time we took back "welfare" from the conservative PR machine. It's not a pejorative like generations have been told.
j-kindz.bsky.social · 2 · 3h ago
The word isn’t the problem. The problem is corporate America convincing everyone that our happiness and well-being isn’t as important as their grotesque wealth.
R. Daniel · 4 · 3h ago
It’s such an important word that it’s used twice in the US Constitution - once for Why the nation exists, and once for How the nation provides it
Sniffit · 0 · 2h ago
MA leading another revolution...
they could solicit “donations”, or else? bsky.app/profile/miss...
billiecat · 0 · 3h ago
Will it take another traitor to his class to fix this mess?
Steven Glaros, M.A. · 1 · 2h ago
That gif should have pince-nez shades…to be historically accurate. 😉
am-mccarthy.bsky.social · 0 · 59m ago
Is he a Democrat? Is he a Democratic Socialist? Is he a "social Democrat" (I don't know, that was some genius' take) I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE NAME!
I bet there could be other public bonuses. We should do some research.😋
Grumbholdt · 0 · 3h ago
Steve G · 0 · 3h ago
Oh THAT communist. 🥸
InfinitelyLoopy · 1 · 3h ago
I’d be curious as to how much of their wealth is even touched by this. The borrow-die model hides most of it. Good to get some tax revenue. Would be socially healthier to get more from those with non-salary supported lifestyles.
Joe is Wypoxic · 0 · 3h ago
💪👏 I get into that a bit in my post from this morning: heymistermix.com/p/our-values...
grooveholmes.bsky.social · 3 · 3h ago
(whispers) Wealth redistribution to have a basic level of what we might call society actually makes a place more desirable to live in
j-kindz.bsky.social · 0 · 3h ago
True
The tax is ONLY an 4% on income over a million dollars. I've actually had GOP MA residents tell me "What does Massachusetts know about taxes and patriotism?!" as if it were some sort of burn.
Shannon Edrie · 0 · 3h ago
Taxing the welfare elite helps ordinary people
kscox.bsky.social · 0 · 2h ago
Read DEMOCRACY IN CHAINS by Nancy MacLeod
It's interesting, because the "exodus" in Massachusetts is easier than almost anywhere else. New Hampshire is RIGHT THERE. And lots of people who worked in MA retire to NH because Nh is a tax haven. Run by mostly lunatics, but low-tax.
Sisyphus Rex · 0 · 3h ago
See also: "They're fleeing California to Texas!!" 😂
People do that, usually tech people to an Austin tech job. Texas as a whole thinks Austin is too woke to really be Texas, but it suffices to teach a lot of the fleeing people that Texas is actually pretty high-cost and pretty low-services.
Citizen.Coping · 11 · 3h ago
Yep, that's true. And it didn't happen. Some people left— those making $200k or so— but that was likely due to affordability because the tax didn't touch them.
Kassax · 0 · 2h ago
Property taxes are higher in NH than MA, and if you live in NH and work in MA you still pay MA income tax anyway, so it's not attractive to wealthy MAGA for *financial* reasons.
Which is why the whining that "omigod, what if our masters desert us?" from the mouthpieces for the ultrarich is just that: whining. There are lots of reasons why high-income-tax states are attractive for business and personal location. And most low-tax states have their own failures.
Rob Honeycutt · 0 · 3h ago
To which every billionaire then responds, whimpering, “But, then I’ll be a little less insanely rich!"
momwondie.bsky.social · 0 · 2h ago
You socialist you!!
Jake Wallace · 0 · 1h ago
Q: I know these extremely rich folks always threaten to leave if a 'wealth tax' (or something similar) is floated. Would it be possible to implement some sort of "exit tax" on those who follow thru with leaving? Or possibly an additional sales tax on properties they sell after leaving?
www.nytimes.com/2026/08/09/u...